PHYSICS Distance from core: 3

Experimental Physics

Beginner

Physics is not just about solving equations on a blackboard; it is an experimental science. To prove a theory, we must perform experiments and take measurements. However, no measurement in the real world is ever completely perfect.

Accuracy vs. Precision

When we take measurements, we must understand two important concepts:

  • Accuracy: How close your measurement is to the true, accepted value.
  • Precision: How close a series of measurements are to one another, regardless of whether they are correct.

Accuracy vs Precision on a Dartboard

Significant Figures

To show how reliable our measurements are, we use significant figures. These are the digits in a number that carry meaningful information about its precision.

For example, if you measure a book's length with a standard ruler, you might write 24.3 cm24.3\text{ cm}. The 22 and 44 are certain, while the .3.3 is an estimate. Writing 24.300 cm24.300\text{ cm} would imply your ruler is far more precise than it actually is.

Basic Rules for Counting Significant Figures:

  1. All non-zero digits are significant (e.g., 438438 has three).
  2. Zeros between non-zero digits are significant (e.g., 105105 has three).
  3. Leading zeros are not significant (e.g., 0.00250.0025 has only two).
  4. Trailing zeros to the right of a decimal point are significant (e.g., 4.704.70 has three).

To understand how these values are cataloged under standard systems of measurement, see the guide on Units and Dimensions.

Intermediate

When standard rulers are too coarse to measure tiny objects, we use specialized laboratory instruments like the Vernier Caliper.

Vernier Calipers

A Vernier caliper consists of a main scale and a sliding auxiliary scale (the Vernier scale) that allows us to read fractions of the smallest division on the main scale.

Anatomy and Reading of a Vernier Caliper

1. Finding the Least Count (LC):
The Least Count is the smallest value that can be measured accurately with the instrument. It is calculated as:

Least Count (LC)=1 Main Scale Division (MSD)1 Vernier Scale Division (VSD)\text{Least Count (LC)} = 1\text{ Main Scale Division (MSD)} - 1\text{ Vernier Scale Division (VSD)}

Typically, 1 MSD=1 mm1\text{ MSD} = 1\text{ mm}, and 10 divisions on the Vernier scale10\text{ divisions on the Vernier scale} align with 9 divisions on the Main scale9\text{ divisions on the Main scale} ($9\text{ mm}$).
Therefore:

1 VSD=910 MSD=0.9 mm1\text{ VSD} = \frac{9}{10}\text{ MSD} = 0.9\text{ mm} LC=1 mm0.9 mm=0.1 mm=0.01 cm\text{LC} = 1\text{ mm} - 0.9\text{ mm} = 0.1\text{ mm} = 0.01\text{ cm}

2. Reading the Instrument:
To find the total reading:

Total Reading=Main Scale Reading (MSR)+(Vernier Scale Coincidence (VSC)×LC)\text{Total Reading} = \text{Main Scale Reading (MSR)} + (\text{Vernier Scale Coincidence (VSC)} \times \text{LC})

3. Accounting for Zero Error:
Sometimes, when the jaws of the caliper are closed, the zero mark of the Vernier scale does not align with the zero of the main scale.

  • Positive Zero Error: The Vernier zero lies to the right of the main scale zero. (Subtract this error from the final reading).
  • Negative Zero Error: The Vernier zero lies to the left of the main scale zero. (Add the magnitude of this error to the final reading).

Significant Figures in Calculations

  • Addition and Subtraction: Round the result to match the least number of decimal places of any number in the input.

    12.11 (two decimals)+8.1 (one decimal)=20.21rounded to 20.212.11\text{ (two decimals)} + 8.1\text{ (one decimal)} = 20.21 \rightarrow \text{rounded to } 20.2
  • Multiplication and Division: Round the result to match the least number of significant figures of any input.

    4.56 (three sig-figs)×1.4 (two sig-figs)=6.384rounded to 6.44.56\text{ (three sig-figs)} \times 1.4\text{ (two sig-figs)} = 6.384 \rightarrow \text{rounded to } 6.4

Advanced

Every experimental measurement is represented as x±Δxx \pm \Delta x, where xx is the measured value and Δx\Delta x is the uncertainty or error.

Classification of Errors

  • Systematic Errors: Constant errors that skew measurements in one direction (e.g., poorly calibrated instruments or zero errors). These can be eliminated by correction.
  • Random Errors: Fluctuations that occur unpredictably. These can be minimized by taking multiple readings and calculating the mean value.

If we take nn measurements of a quantity, the mean value xˉ\bar{x} is:

xˉ=1ni=1nxi\bar{x} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i

The Absolute Error for each measurement is Δxi=xixˉ\Delta x_i = |x_i - \bar{x}|. The mean absolute error is:

Δxmean=1ni=1nΔxi\Delta x_{\text{mean}} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \Delta x_i

The relative error is Δxmeanxˉ\frac{\Delta x_{\text{mean}}}{\bar{x}}, and the percentage error is Δxmeanxˉ×100%\frac{\Delta x_{\text{mean}}}{\bar{x}} \times 100\%.

Propagation of Errors

When calculating a final result from multiple measured quantities, errors propagate through the mathematical operations.

If two independent variables A±ΔAA \pm \Delta A and B±ΔBB \pm \Delta B are used to calculate a value ZZ:

Mathematical Operation Function Maximum Absolute Error ($\Delta Z$)
Sum Z=A+BZ = A + B ΔZ=ΔA+ΔB\Delta Z = \Delta A + \Delta B
Difference Z=ABZ = A - B ΔZ=ΔA+ΔB\Delta Z = \Delta A + \Delta B

For multiplication, division, or powers, relative errors must be added. If Z=AaBbCcZ = A^a B^b C^{-c}:

ΔZZ=aΔAA+bΔBB+cΔCC\frac{\Delta Z}{Z} = a\frac{\Delta A}{A} + b\frac{\Delta B}{B} + c\frac{\Delta C}{C}

Statistical Error Propagation (Quadrature)

If the errors in AA and BB are independent and random, simple addition of absolute errors overestimates the true uncertainty. Instead, we propagate errors in quadrature using partial derivatives:

If Z=f(A,B)Z = f(A, B), then the standard deviation (uncertainty) σZ\sigma_Z is given by:

σZ=(fAσA)2+(fBσB)2\sigma_Z = \sqrt{\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial A}\sigma_A\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial B}\sigma_B\right)^2}

This relation ensures that independent uncertainties are combined geometrically, providing a more statistically robust estimate of experimental precision.